NSSC chair says Japan must observe IAEA’s three principles of protection of radioactivity volumes

Posted on : 2019-09-25 16:16 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
Calls on Tokyo to fully discuss matter with international community  
An image of the Fukushima nuclear power plant
An image of the Fukushima nuclear power plant

Uhm Jae-sik, chairperson of the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), said on Sept. 24 that Japan “must observe the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) three principles of protection, namely the principles of justification, optimization, and limitation [of radioactivity volumes].” He also criticized as “inappropriate” Japan’s response of demanding that South Korea first produce scientific evidence for its warnings about dumping contaminated water from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.

Speaking with reporters at the Press Center in Seoul’s Jung (Central) District that day, Uhm sent the message that the disposal of contaminated water from Fukushima is a matter best discussed fully with Japan’s neighbors and the international community. The three principles he mentioned are prescribed by the IAEA for the handling of unanticipated accidents during the construction and operation of nuclear power plants.

“The scientific bases that Japan is presented looks only at whether it satisfies the principle of limitation – in other words, when it falls within the limits for radioactivity emission. But the principles of justification and optimization need to come ahead of that,” Uhm said.

“In the process of upholding the justification and optimization principles, information must be shared in a transparent and fair way with neighboring South Korea and the international community, and there needs to be a procedure [for soliciting opinions],” he added.

Uhm went on to say that the IAEA “understands the issues and concerns we have raised and views [the ocean dump issue] as important.” On Sept. 16–20, Uhm attended the 63rd IAEA General Conference in Vienna with Moon Mi-ok, first vice minister of science and ICT.

Uhm remained quiet when asked about Seoul’s planned response if Tokyo proceeds with dumping contaminated water into the ocean.

“I don’t think it would be appropriate to make predictions when [the Japanese government] hasn’t made an official decision [to dump the water],” he said.

“If Japan does decide on an ocean dump, we will need to talk again about the unfairness of that,” he added.

“We will also need to establish the possible effects on South Korea and acquire scientific data.”

By Choi Ha-yan, staff reporter

Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles