South Korea’s trade deficit with US in agro-livestock products continues to grow

Posted on : 2017-12-12 17:17 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
The gap has widened since the implementation of the KORUS FTA in 2012
Farmers including Moon Jung-jin of the Korean National Chicken Association urge officials from the Ministry of Trade
Farmers including Moon Jung-jin of the Korean National Chicken Association urge officials from the Ministry of Trade

With imports of American agro-livestock products increasing every year since the South Korea-US Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) took effect in Mar. 2012, South Korea’s trade deficit with the US in agro-livestock products continues to grow as well.

South Korea’s trade deficit with the US in agro-livestock products during the five years since the KORUS FTA took effect (2012–2016) is a yearly average of US$6.7 billion, which is up US$750 million relative to the deficit of US$5.95 billion won in the five years before the agreement took effect (2007–2011). Though South Korea’s exports of agro-livestock products to the US did increase during this period, from a yearly average of US$400 million to US$590 million, the value of American imports leaped US$940 million (14.8%), from US$6.36 billion to US$7.3 billion.

Since the agreement took effect, the rate of increase in US imports (in terms of volume) has been led by fruits and vegetables, such as grapes, cherries and oranges (82.6%); livestock, including beef and pigs (57.8%); and processed foods, including composite food preparations (52.5%). Imports of grains, on the other hand, have declined by 26%. The import value of corn and other grains, which accounts for nearly half of the total US import value, has effectively offset the soaring rate of increase of US imports, since the US’s export volume of grain has been brought down by poor harvests.

“US imports of the items on which tariffs have been abolished are increasing each year in terms of both volume and value. South Korean agricultural exports to the US of vegetable seeds and processed food such as cigarettes, beverages and sausages are increasing,” the Korea Rural Economic Institute reported.

US beef’s domination of the South Korean market appears to be picking up speed. Figures provided by the Korea Trade Statistics Promotion Institute (KTSPI) show that the import volume of US beef increased from 106,000 tons in 2012, the first year after the KORUS-FTA took effect, to 169,000 tons in 2016, and that 151,000 tons have been imported so far this year (as of October).

In September, US beef pushed aside Australian beef to gain the number one share (47.7%) in the imported beef market. The volume of imported US pork rose from 131,000 tons in 2012 to 149,000 tons last year, with 125,000 tons imported through October of this year. Imports of milk powder increased from 19,000 tons in 2012 to 61,000 tons last year.

A comparison of import volume last year with the year before the agreement took effect shows that cherries had increased by 191%, or 226% in terms of value (a 24% tariff was immediately abolished); grapes by 74.9%, or 115% in terms of value (a 24% tariff is being phased out over 17 years); and oranges by 36%, or 64% in terms of value (a 50% tariff is being rolled back over 7 years).

When the agreement was ratified in 2011, the government announced that it had “protected domestic farmers” by applying seasonal tariffs or setting long-term concession schedules of “at least 12 years” for repealing tariffs on a total of 200 “sensitive items,” including beef, pork, grapes, cheese, soybeans for the table, potatoes for the table and milk powder. But in fact, nearly all farm products have been made vulnerable to harm during the five years since the floodgates were opened on imports.

“Superficially, current tariffs were maintained and long-term tariff abolition schedules were implemented, but in reality, the non-tariff quotas are increasing each year. This is leading to a rapid increase in imports, which means that the 10–15 year long-term schedules for tariff rollback are doing almost nothing to protect farmers,” said Lim Jeong-bin, a professor of agricultural economics and sociology at Seoul National University.

By Cho Kye-wan, staff reporter

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles